考研阅读理解态度词汇精选

在日常学习、工作或生活中，大家总少不了接触作文或者范文吧，通过文章可以把我们那些零零散散的思想，聚集在一块。写范文的时候需要注意什么呢？有哪些格式需要注意呢？下面是小编为大家收集的优秀范文，供大家参考借鉴，希望可以帮助到有需要的朋友。

考研阅读理解态度词汇篇一

(2)the tone of the passage would be _____

(3)which of the following best describes the tone of the passage____

(4)what is the attitude of the author towards____

(5)how does the writer feel about______

(6) the writer is of the opinion that_____

(7)the author seems to be _____

考研阅读理解态度词汇篇二

happy/ unhappy; security/insecurity; satisfaction

dissatisfaction, 它们作为标记语反映出作者对某个现象采取的姿态，并从情感的角度评价该现象。因此，考生既要依靠文章的中心思想作为前提，又要注意作者的措辞，尤其是作为修饰语的形容词。我们以2003年的阅读text 4为例具体说明这一点：

yet there are limits to what a society can spend in this pursuit. as a physician, i know the most costly and dramatic measures may be ineffective and painful. i also know that people injapanandsweden, countries that spend far less on medical care, have achieved longer, healthier lives than we have. as a nation, we may be overfunding the quest for unlikely cures while underfunding research on humbler therapies that could improve people’s lives.

59. in contras to theu.s.,japanandswedenare funding their medical care .

[a] more flexibly

[b] more extravagantly

[c] more cautiously

[d] more reasonably

作者用limits, ineffective, painful这些消极的词语暗示了美国医疗卫生系统的缺憾，通过把握这些词语，我们就能得出d为正确选项。所以我们对语言的理解是有一定差异的，又如尼克松签订1972年公报时，对“一个中国”原则，他手下的修辞专家用了acknowledge 而不用recognize。因为后者是正式的，外交的，打心底里的承认，而前者是一种模糊，对某种既成事实的有限度接受，但在中文里出现的就是我们理解的“承认”。

可见考生在平时的单词理解中要结合不同的语境，不同的文章体裁，综合地认知寓意，才能透彻地理解作者的意图。

另外，判断作者情感态度除了关注作者的措辞，还要可以通过关注作者的举例角度和讲解角度，来判断文章作者的态度倾向：如果作者的一直论述某事物的积极地向上 的方面，其态度基本上是积极乐观的;如果作者举例论证某观点时，给的例子是正面的，那么我们同样可以判断作者的态度是积极乐观的;如果作者的论述有好有 坏，举例有正面有反面，我基本上可以判断作者的态度是客观的。同样，我们通过具体的真题案例进一步解释这一点。

再例1997年第54题:

it was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. after six months of arguing and final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates,australia’s northern territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably ill patients who wish to die. the measure passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. almost immediately word flashed on the internet and was picked up, half a world away, by john hofsess, executive director of the right to die society of canada. he sent it on via the group’s on-line service, death net. says hofsess: “we posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn’t just something that happened inaustralia. it’s world history.”

the full import may take a while to sink in.

the nt rights of the terminally iii law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and practical implications. some have breathed sighs of relief, others, including churches, right to life groups and the australian medical association, bitterly attacked the bill and the haste of its passage. but the tide is unlikely to turn back. inaustralia-- where an aging population, life extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part -- other states are going to consider making a similar law to deal with euthanasia. in theusandcanada, where the right to die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes to start falling.

under the new northern territory law, an adult patient can request death -- probably by a deadly injection or pill -- to put an end to suffering. the patient must be diagnosed as terminally ill by two doctors. after a “cooling off” period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. after 48 hours the wish for death can be met. for lloyd nickson, a 54 year old darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the nt rights of terminally iii law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. “i’m not afraid of dying from a spiritual point of view, but what i was afraid of was how i’d go, because i’ve watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks,” he says.

54. the author’s attitude towards euthanasia seems to be that of ________.

[a] opposition

[b] suspicion

[c] approval

[d] indifference

我们通过阅读该文，不难发现文章首段记述了安乐死法案通过以及当时在全球引起的反响，首段作者使用“it is world history”， 来表达他对该事件的态度，认为它意义重大;紧接着在第二段，作者首先讨论世人对此态度不一，但是作者通过转折，指出这个潮流不太可能被逆转了。第三段，作 者用一个肺癌病人为例，该病人认为安乐死法案的通过意味着自己可以平静地度过最后的时光，不用担心临死前要遭受的折磨。很明显这个事例是认识安乐死法案的 通过是一件好事。那么文章就作者的态度命题，答案肯定是approval。